Final Crit & Presentation - Peer Review and Check List

My feedback from my peers about my work for this module:

Studio Brief 2 and 3: Comment on the appropriateness of the response to the proposal provided.

Content and Communication
You've gone through with what you have proposed - in the time available (Printed Pictures)
I can't find a proposal for Moving Pictures (this was due to wrong labeling which I have now corrected!)

Visual Quality 
Both briefs have been consistent with each other and work well together.
The prints are well connected to the texts.

Comment on the overall quantity and quality of work presented.

Quantity
You have clearly spent a lot of time on this, throughout there is a high level of development appropriate to your author.

Quality
Your prints are so detailed, and animations are consistent. The colours work really well.

Comment on the organisation and consistency of the development of work in response to the briefs presented (Studio Practice Blog).

Organisation
Labels are all there and you seem to have documented the key moments. Put the images of your prints in a post - he wants to see them on there. (My prints were linked on to a post however I have now embedded it instead to make it clearer and easier to access.)

Consistency
High level of research and development of images.

Comment on the level of reflection and self evaluation documented throughout the module. 

Studio Brief 2
Planning of animation is effective. 

Studio Brief 3 
High level of reflection throughout.

Comment on the summary evaluation of the work presented. Does it appropriately reflect the work that you have reviewed?

Make sure what you are saying is important, and not just there to fill the gaps. Overall it seems good - a range of positives and negatives discussed. (I need to cut down the words in my evaluation so in doing so this will hopefully eradicate the unimportant information which may be 'filling the gaps'.)


OUIL504 Module Submission- Check List

Have responses to all three briefs been clearly presented for the final crit? Do you understand what the work is about and trying to communicate? (including who/what the author and text is?
During crit work on table evidences all briefs; Blog however is lacking. 

Is all work for the module clearly accessible on the Studio Practice blog? (Correctly labeled, images/movies viewable, organised clearly)
Try embedding ISSUU slideshows as opposed to just posting links to them (I have done this with a lot of my images now.)

Does the choice and selection of work and submission format appropriately represent the work produced in response to the module?
That's all sound.  

Are there any issues that you have identified with the work ahead of submission? 
Just get blog up to date. I am sure you already know all the things I have wrote down. 


Comments from peers on physical work (sketchbooks/prints/animation)

• Well presented body of work.
• Beautiful patterns and use of colour in sketchbook.
• Printed pictures are beautifully presented!
• I love your Studio Brief 1.
• Sketchbook
• What beautiful intricacy and time put into your moving pictures. Looks like so much effort. Can't get over how beautiful everything is. 
• Good sense of continuity in prints and moving pictures.
• Amazing work produced and so much of it.
• Everything is so pretty just lovely. Well done to you. 
• You have some ridiculously insane visual development here- well done.
• Beautiful sketchbooks.
• Insane and lovely sketchbooks.
• Highly informed prints... Vast amount of varied development.